Why Vets Could Soon Be Forced To Show You Prices Up Front

Getty Images

The competition watchdog has had enough of pet owners being kept in the dark about what their vet bills will actually cost. After investigating the industry, they’ve found that most practices don’t publish any prices at all, and when the bills arrive, they’re often eye-wateringly high with no warning.

The Competition and Markets Authority is now proposing that vets be legally required to display their prices clearly, so you can actually compare costs before your pet needs treatment, rather than discovering you owe thousands after the fact.

The current situation is genuinely shocking

According to the CMA’s investigation, 84% of vet practice websites have absolutely no pricing information. None. You’re expected to just turn up, agree to treatment, and hope for the best when the bill comes.

Even worse, vet prices have risen by 63% over seven years, and that’s nearly double the rate of inflation. The same treatment can cost wildly different amounts depending on which practice you use, but you’ve got no way of knowing that because nobody publishes their prices.

What treatments actually cost in the UK right now

Getty Images/iStockphoto

The CMA managed to gather some price ranges from the limited information available, and the variation is staggering:

Vaccinations: £50 to £200
Neutering a dog: £120 to £700
Neutering a cat: £50 to £300
Emergency out-of-hours care: £200 to £300 (just for the consultation)

That’s the same procedure potentially costing you six times more depending on which vet you happen to walk into. However, because practices don’t publish prices, you can’t shop around or budget properly.

Real people are facing impossible choices.

Nicole Hawley’s dog Ernie inhaled a grass seed on a walk that became infected. The emergency vet gave her two options: put him down, or pay £12,000 for surgery, she shared with BBC News.

She and her partner took out a loan and used their wedding savings to cover it. They made the decision in five minutes because what choice did they have? But they only found themselves in that position because Ernie got ill while Nicole was switching insurance providers.

This is happening to people across the country. The RSPCA says their officers see animals suffering because owners are delaying treatment or avoiding vets entirely due to costs they can’t predict or afford.

Big corporate chains are charging significantly more.

The CMA found that practices owned by large vet groups charge 16.6% more on average than independent vets. However, here’s the problem: you often don’t know your local practice has been bought by a corporate chain because they keep the original name.

A BBC Four investigation earlier this year heard from whistleblowers inside the industry, blaming soaring bills on big companies buying up practices. The CMA is now recommending vets be forced to reveal if they’re part of a large group.

What the watchdog wants to change.

Getty Images

The CMA’s proposals would require vets to meet a variety of conditions to make costs clearer and pet care less stressful for owners:

• Display clear price lists so you can compare costs between practices
• Give you written prices for any treatment over £500 before you agree to it
• Provide itemised bills showing exactly what you’re paying for
• Tell you if they’re owned by a large corporate group
• Cap prescription fees at £16 (many vets currently charge far more)
• Automatically give you a written prescription for medicines you’ll need regularly, so you can buy them cheaper online
• Show clear pricing for cremation services and pet care plans

They also want to ban vets receiving bonuses for recommending specific treatments, which creates an obvious conflict of interest.

Why vets say it’s complicated

The British Veterinary Association supports more transparency, but has concerns about how comprehensive price lists would work in practice. They argue that veterinary care is complex and varied, so standardised pricing might create confusion.

Francesca Verney, who runs an independent practice, points out that equipment is incredibly expensive. A CT scanner costs a quarter of a million pounds, plus staff to operate it safely. Unlike humans, animals need anaesthesia for procedures where we’d just be asked to lie still.

She’s frustrated that vets are seen as money-motivated when the costs reflect genuine expenses. But the issue isn’t whether those costs are justified. It’s whether pet owners should know what they are before committing.

The medicine markup is particularly egregious

The CMA found that many people are paying twice what they need to for vet medicines. Vets can charge whatever they want for prescriptions and for the medicines themselves, even though you could buy the same medication far cheaper online.

Currently, if you want to buy medicine elsewhere, you have to ask your vet for a written prescription and pay a fee for it, which some practices set deliberately high to discourage you. The proposal to cap that fee at £16 and automatically provide prescriptions for regular medications would save pet owners significant money.

When this might actually happen

Getty Images

These are provisional findings. The CMA is accepting submissions until next month, with a final decision due next year. If approved, the changes would be implemented through a legally binding order expected before the end of 2026.

Smaller vet businesses would get additional time to comply, but larger practices and corporate chains would need to start displaying prices within that timeframe.

Why the current system is stuck in 1966

Martin Coleman from the CMA pointed out that veterinary regulation was set up in 1966, when the industry looked completely different. Individual vets are regulated, but the businesses that now own the majority of practices aren’t.

The market has changed dramatically thanks to corporate consolidation, rising costs, and complex insurance products, but the regulatory framework hasn’t kept up. Pet owners are left navigating an expensive, opaque system with no protection and no way to make informed choices.

If these proposals go through, you’ll finally be able to see what different practices charge and make informed decisions about where to take your pet. You’ll get written estimates for expensive treatments instead of discovering the cost after agreeing. You’ll know if your friendly local vet is actually owned by a massive corporation.

It won’t make veterinary care cheap, especially since equipment, training, and staff all cost money, but it will at least give you the information you need to budget, compare, and avoid being blindsided by bills you can’t afford. Which, frankly, should have been the standard all along.